Which reasoning method applies general statements to specific facts?

Deductive reasoning is the correct method that applies general statements to specific facts. This form of reasoning starts with general principles or premises and draws specific conclusions from them. For instance, if you have a general statement such as "All humans are mortal," and you know a specific case, like "Socrates is a human," you can deduce that "Socrates is mortal."

This method is characterized by its logical structure, where conclusions follow necessarily if the premises are true. It highlights the strength of a conclusion being certain, provided that the initial general statements are accurate. Deductive reasoning is fundamental in formal logic and mathematics, where conclusions are drawn from established theories or axioms.

In contrast, the other reasoning methods presented serve different purposes. Analytic reasoning involves breaking down complex information into simpler parts, examining relationships and structures rather than directly applying general rules to specific instances. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making broader generalizations based on specific observations, moving from specific cases to general conclusions. Intuitive reasoning relies on instinct or gut feelings rather than structured logical processes. Each of these methods has its own applications, but for the context of applying general statements to specific facts, deductive reasoning is what fits best.